Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ginkel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2014PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Appellant, Robert J. Thompson (“Thompson”), appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee, Eugene P. Ginkel (“Ginkel”). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand the case for trial.

On June 26, 2008, Ginkel served as the lead technician for a fireworks display consisting of two parts, a main event and a grand finale. For the main event, a rack of ten 3" diameter mortar tubes were loaded with 10 shells, with Ginkel lighting one fuse every thirty to forty seconds. As they were fired, another individual,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Valentino v. Philadelphia Triathlon, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. WFIC, LLC v. LaBarre, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Feleccia, A. v. Lackawanna CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Seneca Resources Corp. v. S & T BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Kornfeind, W. v. New Werner Holding Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API