Legal Opinion

Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2011No. 2575 EDA 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.:

Following settlement and entry of judgment with regard to the last remaining defendant in a mass asbestos products liability action, Appellant Patricia Linster, as Executrix of the Estate of her husband, Matthew Linster, and individually as widow in her own right, presents challenges to the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting summary judgment in favor of Crane Company. 1 We vacate the judgment, reverse the order granting summary judgment in favor of Crane Company, and remand for further proceedings.

The relevant facts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Tarzia v. American StandardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kardos, J. v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Schwartz v. Abex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Fisher v. SexauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Howard v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Kardos, J. v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API