Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.F.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 7, 2007No. 97,929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Cases that involve children are challenging for eveiyone. The children must be protected. Their rights — as well as those of the parents and others with an interest in them — must be protected. And the legal process must move with some dispatch so that disputes may be resolved within a reasonable time frame, even as time is perceived by a child.

Our challenge here is to decide whether the dispute presented to us may even be heard in our appellate court at all. The child in this case, 3-year-old A.F., was placed into the custody of the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. PastineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. In re D.D.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. In re T.D.W.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  4. In the Interest of D.M.M.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. In the Interest of D.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of N.A.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. In Re Interest of T.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Interest of C.E.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. In re N.E.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  5. In re the Guardianship of SokolCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API