Legal Opinion

Interest of C.E.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 27, 2012No. 105,585PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, J.:

In order to appeal a case brought under die Revised Kansas Code for Care of Children, K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 38-2201 el seq., one must be a party or an interested party in the case. In addition, only certain orders are appealable. K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 38-2273. The Secretary of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS) appealed a placement order made by a magistrate judge to the district court. The district court found diat it lacked jurisdiction to hear SRS’s appeal because SRS was neitiier a party nor an interested party as defined by the statute, nor was a placement order an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. In re T.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  5. In the Interest of A.F.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Interest of N.A.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. In the Interest of A.E.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. In the Interest of N.A.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  4. In Re CeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. In re N.A.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API