Legal Opinion

Baumgardner v. Balmer

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1987No. Docket 89392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from a $500 award, representing attorney fees, in this paternity action. We reverse the award.

ATTORNEY FEES

As a general rule, American courts have refused to allow the recovery of attorney fees either as an element of the costs of a suit or as an item of damages, unless allowance of a fee is expressly authorized by statute or court rule. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co v Allen, 50 Mich App 71, 74; 212 NW2d 821 (1973). See also Matras v Amoco Oil Co, 424 Mich 675, 695; 385 NW2d 586 (1986).

In Michigan, attorney fees may not be recovered as an element of costs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Gundersen v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Houfek v. ShaferMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Kuberski v. PanfilMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. GIANNETTI BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. In Re Swantek EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Lopez-Flores v. Hamburg TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Tiedel v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Sucoe v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API