Kuberski v. Panfil
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.
This appeal is in the nature of mandamus to compel vacation of an order giving defendant taxable costs ag’ainst plaintiff incident to transferring plaintiff’s case from the law side of the court to the chancery side, such transfer having been ordered on plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff’s suit in as sumpsit was started on the theory that she could recover on an instrument supposed to be a promissory note; but after testimony had been taken the court decided that plaintiff’s remedy was not an action on the note, but for an accounting arising out of a partnership relation. It was at this stage of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jeffery v. HurshMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Hester v. Commissioners of Parks & BoulevardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Schook v. Iron Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Gundersen v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Brown v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Commissioner of Insurance v. Lapeer Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Oscoda Chapter of Pbb Action Committee, Inc v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.