Legal Opinion
Montefusco Excavating & Contracting Co. v. County of Middlesex
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 14, 1980PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
SCHREIBER, J.
On or about December 18, 1975, plaintiff, Montefusco Excavating & Contracting Co., Inc. (Montefusco), entered into a contract with defendant County of Middlesex to construct part of a water and sewer system in the Raritan Arsenal County Park in Edison, N. J. The contract price was $147,451. During the performance of the work, the contractor asserted that the County owed it additional monies for extra work arising out of unusual subsurface conditions. A dispute arose and apparently Montefusco stopped the job when these funds were not paid.
Mo…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ambassador Insurance Company v. MontesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Hedgebeth v. MedfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Key Agency v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Klacik v. KovacsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Graybar Electric Co. v. Manufacturers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Universal Bonding Insurance Co. v. Gittens And Sprinkle Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Liberty International Underwriters Canada v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.