Legal Opinion

Holloway v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 29, 1991PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

This complex litigation arises from a swimming pool accident that left a prison inmate crippled. The prisoner sued the State under the Tort Claims Act. The State in turn impleaded various third-party defendants involved in the manufacture and distribution of the pool, asserting that they were liable under principles of negligence and strict products liability. Its actions against those so-called “pool defendants” included claims for indemnification and contribution as well as a direct claim for reimbursement of substantial medical expenses the State had incurred in the care of the prisoner.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Kolitch v. LindedahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Brown v. United States Stove Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Town of Kearny v. BrandtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Muhammad v. New Jersey TransitSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Borough of SomervilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API