Legal Opinion

Oxford Varnish Corp. v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1941No. 8221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint upon the ground *45that all claims in suit of four patents alleged to be infringed are invalid. Appellants prosecuted no appeal from the holding as to Casto and Lang, 1,807,894. The case involves Claims 1, 2 and 5 of Henry 1,548,465, issued August 4, 1925; Claims ,7 and 8 of Von Webern and Hamant, 1,900,030, issued March 7, 1933, and Claims 1 and 4 of Casto and Von Webern, 1,-946,483, issued February 13, 1934.

Appellant Oxford Varnish Corporation manufactures wood-graining equipment and licenses such equipment and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. John E. Thropp's Sons Co. v. SeiberlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Paine & Williams Co. v. Baldwin Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chiplets, Inc. v. June Dairy Products Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
  2. Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
  3. West Shore Manufacturing Co. v. Wesson Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API