Legal Opinion
Barder v. McClung
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1949No. Civ. 17135PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
The instant action for damages is based upon the alleged fraud of defendants in a sale to plaintiff of residence property in Los Angeles consisting of a five-room dwelling and a detached garage containing a dwelling unit of one room, kitchen and bath. When the buildings were originally constructed in 1941, separate building permits were issued upon application of defendants ’ contractor, the permit for the garage building carrying the notation: “Double Garage—with living quarters—Den and Bath—No kitchen.” Also ‘ ‘ Zone & yards O .K. Byron 6-20-41. ’ ’
In 1943, without obtaining a permit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Clauser v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Miles v. Perpetual Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.