Legal Opinion

Warren v. Sessoms & Rogers, P.A.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2012No. 10-2105, 10-2155PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

Margaret Warren sued the law firm of Sessoms & Rogers, P.A. (“S & R”) and attorney Lee C. Rogers (collectively “the defendants”), alleging that they violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. Prior to any discovery, the defendants made Warren an offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. When Warren did not accept the offer, the defendants then moved to dismiss this action. They contended that the offer of judgment mooted Warren’s case and, in the alternative,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Jerome Williams v. Jon OzmintCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  3. Diane Russell v. Absolute Collection ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Janetos v. Fulton Friedman & Gullace, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Gabriele v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API