DOYAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. Blair
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Judge.
We have reviewed the record and the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial judge, and conclude that those findings and conclusions are amply supported by the evidence and are adequate to dispose of the issues raised below. This court will not disturb findings and conclusions that are not "clearly erroneous.” CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). See cases cited in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 133 Ga. App. 613 (2) (211 SE2d 642), reversed on other grounds in Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471), vacated in Doyal Development Co.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doyal Development Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Doyal Development Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Doyal Development Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casey v. Carrollton Ford Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Yalanzon v. SHARON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Johnson v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Associated Distributors, Inc. v. McBeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976