Legal Opinion
In Re Creviston
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 25, 1993No. Bankruptcy 2-92-06532PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION AND DENYING CONFIRMATION
BARBARA J. SELLERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction And Jurisdiction
This matter is before the Court on the request of debtor Roger L. Creviston for confirmation of his Second Amended Chapter 12 Plan (“Plan”). Confirmation was objected to by the United States of America on behalf of the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”) and by Frank M. Pees, the Chapter 12 standing trustee (“Trustee”.) The objection of B & T Enterprises, Inc. in joint venture with CRGI, LP has been resolved. The United States of America on behalf of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Matter of Bernard Armstrong, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- In Re George Roger Easton and Elsie M. Easton, Debtors. Otoe County National Bank v. George Roger Easton and Elsie M. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Matter of BurkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cottonport Bank v. DichiaraDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1996
- In Re GregersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- In Re BarnettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
- In Re MaynardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003