Legal Opinion

In Re Barnett

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 14, 1993No. 19-40004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

A. Introduction

This is a Chapter 12 case. Pending is confirmation of debtor’s Plan, and the Objections to Confirmation filed by the Chapter 12 trustee and Citizen’s Bank & Trust Co. (“Citizen’s”) In addition, Citizen’s has filed a Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (L) over which this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(a) and (b)(1). For the reasons set forth below, I order confirmation of debtor’s proposed plan and deny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Bernard Armstrong, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re George Roger Easton and Elsie M. Easton, Debtors. Otoe County National Bank v. George Roger Easton and Elsie M. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Matter of Grogg Farms, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  4. In Re RottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1988
  5. In Re CrevistonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cottonport Bank v. DichiaraDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1996
  2. Integra Bank, N.A. v. Ross (In Re Ross)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API