Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
We granted certiorari to clarify the allocation of authority, as between the federal courts and the Interstate Commerce Commission, to set and review rates for movements of coal by rail.
I
This case arose as a result of a 1972 decision of San Antonio, Tex., acting through its City Public Service Board, to substitute coal-generated electricity for natural gas. Toward that end, in 1974, San Antonio entered into long-term contracts to purchase coal from two suppliers in Campbell County, Wyo.; began to construct two coal-fired generating units; and initiated negotiations with Burlington Northern…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Cross-Appellees v. San Antonio, Texas, Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. Wisconsin Central LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.