Alianell v. Schreiner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam,
The opinion of the court below, granting a new trial, states: “Plaintiff sued for personal injury inflicted on *153him by an automobile truck, which, according to his allegation, explicitly denied in the affidavit of defense, was owned by defendant and was being driven in the latter’s business by his employee. The sum total of proof to show ownership and agency consisted of plaintiff’s testimony, ‘Schreiner’s truck hit me,’ to which another witness added, ‘Schreiner’s car came up the hill and bumped him.’ There was not a scintilla of proof that the ‘Schreiner’ referred to in this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hess v. GusdorffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Frank, Admr. v. BayukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Am. Products Co. v. Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Williamson v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Sloan v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.