Legal Opinion

Meurer Steel Barrel Co. v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 1, 1924No. 3110PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit to recover damages from the defendant for breach of a contract wherein the plaintiff, owner of Letters Patent No. 891,895, had granted the defendant a non-exclusive licence to practice the invention for the life of the patent upon payment of royalties of not less than $5,000 a year, terminable by the plaintiff upon sixty days’ written notice. The parties stipulated the facts, waived a jury and tried the ease to the court. It appears from the stipulation that the defendant manufactured under the contract, paid some…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Friedman v. Tappan Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. PrescottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Allen v. Rose Park PharmacyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Bradford v. BillingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API