People v. Harris
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This interlocutory appeal was filed by the prosecution after the district court granted the defendant’s motion to suppress certain statements which he made in the course of a custodial interrogation by the police. The defendant, Hoyt Allen Harris, is charged with first-degree burglary. At the conclusion of the suppression hearing, the district court ruled that defendant’s statements to police officers after he was arrested were elicited in violation of the procedural safeguards set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We affirm the ruling of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- People v. FishSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. TraubertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- State v. GayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Giacomazzi v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.