Hackney v. . Hood, Commissioner of Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
The only question of law presented by this appeal is whether depositors and other creditors of a banking corporation, created by and organized under the laws of this State, and in the hands of the Commissioner of Banks of this State, for liquidation under the provisions of section 218(c), N. 0. Code of 1931, are entitled to interest, at the rate of six per cent, on the principal amount of their claims, from the date on which the Commissioner of Banks took possession of the corporation and its assets, until his final settlement with the stockholders, where after the payment of all costs and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- McRae v. . MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Crawford v. Bank of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
- Bank of Charlotte v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
3Cited by12 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Farmers Bank of NewtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
- Jones v. SkinnerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State Banking Commissioner v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. FalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Powell v. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.