Legal Opinion

Jones v. Skinner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This is an injunction suit instituted by plaintiffs as the representative of certain stockholders of the Bank of Commerce, of Wasco, Oregon, which bank was closed as insolvent by the superintendent of banks, and in the course of its liquidation all depositors have been paid the principal sums due them with interest to the date of the closing of said bank. There now being a surplus of about $25,000 in the hands of said defendant as superintendent of banks, plaintiffs seek a decree restraining defendant from paying interest upon deposits and requiring him to call a meeting of stockholders with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flynn v. American Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  2. Greva v. RaineyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hackney v. . Hood, Commissioner of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Clemons v. Est. of ClemonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  5. Powell v. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fisher Broadcasting, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Farmers Bank of NewtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. State Banking Commissioner v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Liq. Badger State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Haugo v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API