Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Falk
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
On the former appeal, on rehearing the court said, page 377:
“The instant petition states a case for allowance of some interest even if the six per cent demanded is not allowable. At any rate the question of what interest is allowable has not been adequately briefed. ... In this situation, we treat the opinion heretofore filed as merely holding that some interest is allowable and leave the' precise basis of the allowance to be determined by the trial court upon the facts shown by the proofs or the stipulation of the parties.”
The respondent’s claim is based on 12 USCA, sec. 264 (1), (7), which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- People v. . Merchants' Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- American Nat. Bank of Arkansas City v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Bates v. Farmers Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Banking CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Liq. Badger State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Parsons v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944
- Haugo v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.