Powell v. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNnoe, J.
It is conceded by both plaintiff and defendants that, there is no error in tbe judgment in tbis ease that plaintiff recover of tbe defendants tbe sum of $468.63. It was agreed by them that tbis is. tbe amount now due tbe plaintiff on ber deposit in tbe United Bank & Trust Company, at tbe date of tbe closing of said bank, to wit, 8 February, 1933. Tbe judgment to that effect is affirmed.
Tbe defendants contend that plaintiff is not entitled to recover interest on tbe amount of ber deposit or any part thereof, and on their appeal to. tbis Court assign as error in tbe judgment tbe allowance of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Central Trust Co. v. CondonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- First Nat. Bank v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
- Tredegar Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. SkinnerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Zimmerman v. Central Union BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Ex Parte M.F.S. L. Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Northwestern Trust Co.'s Case (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- In re Merion Title & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.