Gervasi v. Seattle & Rainier Valley Railway Co.

This action was brought to recover damages to an automobile. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict against the defendant in the sum of six hundred dollars. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial being made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant appeals.

The facts are these: January 7, 1926, the respondent B. Knox Boberts, a sole trader doing business under the name of E. Knox Eoberts Motors, sold to the respondent Louis Gervasi an automobile by contract which purports to be one of conditional…