Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Speck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1932No. 23709. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— This is an action in replevin instituted by plaintiff for the purpose of recovering possession of an automobile which had been delivered by defendants to plaintiff under a contract of conditional sale, according to the terms of which plaintiff agreed to pay for the ear $1,000.90, receipt of $350 on account of the purchase price being acknowledged. Defendants contended that plaintiff was in default in his payments, and that, for this reason, they were entitled to repossess the car, and they accordingly took possession thereof.

The facts in connection with the seizure of the car became the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lahn Simmons v. Matzen Woolen MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. West American Finance Co. v. FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Schultz v. Wells Butchers' Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Roberts v. SpeckWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gervasi v. Seattle & Rainier Valley Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Investment Service Co. v. LaLondeWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Joe Heaston Tractor & Implement Co. v. ClaussenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Smith v. DownsWashington Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API