Raymond Bros. Impact Pulverizer Co. v. Thomas
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— This was an action in replevin to recover tbe possession of certain machinery. At tbe time tbe action was instituted, tbe plaintiff filed a bond and took possession of tbe property. By answer tbe defendant asserted title thereto. Tbe cause was tried to tbe court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which tbe court'concluded that the title to tbe property was in tbe defendant, and ordered its return, or if this was not done, that the defendant would be entitled to judgment against the plaintiff in the sum of $1,770. From the judgment entered in accordance with the findings…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lahn Simmons v. Matzen Woolen MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- West American Finance Co. v. FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Schultz v. Wells Butchers' Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
- Roche Fruit & Produce Co. v. VaughtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Nettleton v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Roberts v. SpeckWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. DownsWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Schumaker v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Ward v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1937