Legal Opinion

Lahn Simmons v. Matzen Woolen Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1928No. 20776. Department TwoPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

After this action was instituted, receivers were appointed for the defendant, the Matzen Woolen Mills, a corporation. Thereafter, the American Insurance Agency presented a petition asking that certain of the property be turned over to it as owner. The Dexter Horton National Bank intervened and resisted the petition of the insurance agency. The trial resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining the position of the bank and holding that the insurance agency did not have title to the property in question. From the judgment thus entered, the insurance agency appeals.

T…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Green v. McDowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Parks v. Yakima Valley Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API