Legal Opinion
United States v. Yee Ngee How
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 12, 1952No. 33097PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.
Yee Ngee How, under indictment for violation of Title 21 U.S.C.A. § 174, seeks by petition to this court to suppress as evidence in any criminal proceeding against him a quantity of opium taken from him by representatives of the Customs Service of the United States. The petitioner has also presented his motion to dismiss the indictment against him upon the theory that if his petition to suppress the opium is granted there will remain insufficient evidence to support such an indictment.
Suppression of this evidence is sought upon the ground that it was obtained…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Yves Glaziou and Rene L. A. LemieuxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Kenneth R. Marsh and Marion W. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Moises Rivas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Paul Garcia Murgia, Pedro Hernandez Ramirez and Joe Ramirez Carpio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.