Legal Opinion

Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Iseley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

This action was instituted in the Superior Court of Wake County under the authority and pursuant to the provisions of chapter 102, Public Laws of North Carolina, 1931, which is entitled, “An act to authorize declaratory judgments.”

In Walker v. Phelps, 202 N. C., 344, 163 S. E., 126, speaking of this act, we said: “This act is remedial; its purpose is to settle and afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, status, and other legal relations, and is to be liberally'construed and administered. It is so declared in section 12 of the act.” A liberal construction of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Poore v. . PooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Walker v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Russell v. Kentucky Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Hanner v. Hillcrest Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Sharpe v. Park Newspapers of Lumberton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API