Legal Opinion

State v. Byars

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 1908No. 6764PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Before George Johnstone, SpEciar Judge, Richland, Indictment against R. F. Byars for murder of.......... . . . .i. ,|.Stale appeals' from motion granting- new trial. Oral argument. cites: Is viewing locus in quo taking evidence? 133 Oal., 171; 70 Mis®., 755; 74 Cal., 570; 3 Bay., 94; 24 Ra. Ann., 47; 5 Ark., 432; 10 Id., 518; 19 Id., 209; Whar. Cr.

Read the full summary

Before George Johnstone, SpEciar Judge, Richland, Indictment against R. F. Byars for murder of.......... . . . .i. ,|.Stale appeals' from motion granting- new trial. Oral argument. cites: Is viewing locus in quo taking evidence? 133 Oal., 171; 70 Mis®., 755; 74 Cal., 570; 3 Bay., 94; 24 Ra. Ann., 47; 5 Ark., 432; 10 Id., 518; 19 Id., 209; Whar. Cr. PI. & Pr., 707; 68 Mo., 203; 42 Tex., 44; 3 Bask., 25; 33 Cal., 60'; 109 N. Y., 43; 30 Ark., 326; 68 Wis., 530; 103' S. W. R., 780; 13 Atl., 774. Prisoner should be present: 36 S. C., 506; 22 W. Va., 800; 20 Ohio, 31; 32 Tex., 430. Waiver of right…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

At the September term of tíre Court of General Sessions for Richland, the defendant, R. F. Byars, was put upon his trial for murder, and the jury found him guilty; whereupon the defendant made a motion for a new trial upon the following five ground's :

1. “Because the evidence does not support the verdict.

2. “Because his Honor erred, as' a matter of law, in not directing the defendant to accompany the jury in viewing the premises and not including in the order that the defendant, as well as his counsel, should accompany the jury.

3.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  2. State v. TimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RoysterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Hanner v. Hillcrest Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Ex Parte MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API