Legal Opinion

Pinkerton v. Schwiethale

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1972No. 46,201PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This appeal questions the constitutionality of K. S. A. 1971 Supp. 60-2006. This statute authorizes the allowance of a reasonable attorney fee as costs in actions on small claims of less than $500.00. The claims must be for damages caused by the negligent operation of motor vehicles. Attorneys’ fees are allowed only to the prevailing party if he recovers damages.

The appellant, Karl Schwiethale, contends the statute is constitutionally impermissible under the equal protection and due process clause of the United States Constitution (Amendment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. BauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City, Kansas Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Chavez v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API