Legal Opinion
State v. Jordan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 6, 2007No. A06-1445PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
This is a pretrial appeal from an order granting appellant Robert Joseph Jordan’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from a nighttime search of his home. Jordan and his wife were not present at the time of the search but Jordan’s pregnant daughter, her boyfriend, and a third individual were present and each was in bed. Based on evidence obtained during the search of his home, Jordan was charged with one count of third-degree possession of a controlled substance. The district court concluded that the warrant application lacked sufficient facts to justify a nighttime…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.