Legal Opinion

State v. Stephenson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 2009No. A07-2312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of his presence at his home that was obtained during a warrantless search. Because there was a specific and valid legal order prohibiting appellant’s presence at the home at the time the police officer conducted the ■ search, appellant had no reasonable expectation of privacy, and we therefore affirm.

FACTS

On July 13, 2007, appellant Cedric Stephenson’s wife, T.L.S., petitioned for an order for protection (OFP) against appellant due to verbal and mental abuse and threats of physical…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Murdaugh v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Antoine Cortez-DutrievilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Gerald SchramCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. Tyler BoyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  4. Hayes v. AcuityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
  5. United States v. MurrayDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API