Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Gold

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 1946No. 34,130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 22 N.W.2d 923. This case is here on certiorari to the industrial commission.

On June 29, 1943, relator, Alma Simpson, started work as a power-machine operator for the Fairmaid Hat Manufacturing Company. She worked on khaki and blue-and-white-striped material until May 24, 1944, when she was given blue denim cloth to work on. She continued to work on it until noon of the next day, when she became ill and left her work. She went to a doctor, who found an itching, burning, and swelling on the skin of her face and neck. Her case was diagnosed as acute dermatitis. A "patch test" was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Hertz v. Watab Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Kundiger v. Waldorf Paper Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Enkel v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Olson v. CarltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartzell v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. In Re Trusteeship Under Agreement With MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Fleischer v. State Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Hodgin v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API