Legal Opinion

Dorr v. Maine Maritime Academy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

Lyle Dorr appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying his petition for review pursuant to 39 M.R.SA § 2(5)(A)(1) (Supp.1991), 1 that exempts from the Workers’ Compensation Act “[pjersons engaged in maritime employment or in interstate or foreign commerce, who are within the exclusive jurisdiction of admiralty law or the laws of the United States.” The Commission held that Dorr fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. 688, and therefore he was not an employee protected by the Workers’ Compensation Act. Because we conclude…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guilford Transportation Industries v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Darla J. Potter v. Great Falls Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  3. Polak v. Riverside Marine Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  4. Dize v. Ass'n of Maryland PilotsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. MAINE MARITIME ACADEMY v. FITCHDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API