Polak v. Riverside Marine Construction, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge.
“After consideration of plaintiffs objection thereto (Docket No. 68), Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted.”
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Michael Polak (“Polak”), was employed by the defendant, Riverside Marine Construction, Inc. (“Riverside”), from August 27, 2009 until approximately March 1, 2010. Polak alleges that he was injured on the job on August 31, 2009, when a piling rolled off the blades of a Bobcat forklift and landed on his…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guida v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- In re: John Good as owner of the F/V Alosa, For Exoneration From Or Limitation Of LiabilityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Marston v. OrlandoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019