Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1924No. 12602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES. O.

This is an appeal taken by the plaintiffs in error from the district court of Muskogee county, Okla., from the order and judgment of said court denying the motion to set aside the forfeiture of a certain criminal appearance bond, wherein the state of Oklahoma was plaintiff and Redfield Richard was defendant. Prior to the institution of this proceeding, the case of the state against Richards was called for trial, and he failing to appear, a forfeiture of his bond was declared by the court; and the day following, and during the same term of court, plaintiffs in error appeared…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. Hankin v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. United States v. StevensUnited States Circuit Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Sullivan v. LittrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API