Legal Opinion

Lubrano v. Brennan Beer Gorman/Architects, LLP

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided August 2, 2007No. GDTC-T-05-105-TBWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ARTICULATION OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THE DEFENDANT “TUCKER MECHANICAL’’

WILSON, Judge.

I

In a Memorandum of Decision of April 12, 2007, this court denied a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by three of the original Defendants in this action (collectively the Defendants “Tucker Mechanical”). Those Defendants asserted that the Plaintiffs action was barred by the “applicable” statute of limitations. The issue before the court was: which was, or were, the statute, or statutes of limitations applicable to this action. The Plaintiffs had asserted in their complaint that “Pursuant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Ager v. Office of Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
  4. Kelly v. Stop and Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Drysdale ex rel. Drysdale v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API