Kelly v. Stop and Shop, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
918 A.2d 249 (2007)
281 Conn. 786
Maureen KELLY et al.
v.
STOP AND SHOP, INC.
No. 17404.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued February 7, 2006.
Decided April 3, 2007.
Steve D. Ecker, Hartford, with whom, on the brief, were, James R. Smart, Michael A. Stratton, Joel T. Faxon and Michael R. Denison, New Haven, for the appellant (named plaintiff).
Suzannah K. Nigro, Trumbull, for the appellee (defendant).
NORCOTT, KATZ, PALMER, VERTEFEUILLE, ZARELLA, DiPENTIMA and McLACHLAN, Js.[1]
PALMER, J.
The principal issue raised by this appeal is whether this court should adopt the so-called "mode of operation" rule,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Blair v. West Town MallTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams v. United Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Edwards v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Konesky v. Post Road EntertainmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Dominguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.