Legal Opinion

Henderson v. For-Shor Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 10, 1988No. 870502-CAPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

In a memorandum decision entered December 17, 1984, the First District Court ruled that appellant For-Shor Company (“For-Shor”) wrongfully repossessed cement forms from respondents that had been purchased by Mitchell Henderson (“Mitchell”) and sold to his grandmother, Eileen Buttars (“Buttars”). Judgment was entered in favor of Buttars for $7,500 in fair rental value of the forms ($2,500 for each of the three years between the date of the conversion and the judgment) and $5,725.35 for the fair market value of the forms. Respondent Laurena Henderson was awarded a judgment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Alta Industries, Ltd. v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mountain States Broadcasting Co. v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Walker Drug Co., Inc. v. La Sal Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API