Legal Opinion

Locke v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2007No. 79222-4, 79381-6PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

172 P.3d 705 (2007)

Kevin J. LOCKE and Tori Locke, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents,

v.

The CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation; and The City of Seattle Fire Department, Petitioners, and

James Sewell; Molly Douce; John Cameron; John Does 1-5, in their individual capacities; The State of Washington, its subdivisions and agencies; and The Washington State Patrol, Defendants.

Margaret A. Lindell, personal representative for the estate of Gary R. Lindell, deceased, Respondent,

v.

The City of Seattle, a municipal corporation, Petitioner.

Nos. 79222-4, 79381-6.

Su…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. J & B Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Michael v. Mosquera-LacyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API