Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Wickstrand

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

A pedestrian crossing the highway within any marked or unmarked crosswalk at an intersection where the movement of traffic is not being regulated by traffic officers or control signals, has the right of way. Sec. 85.44, Stats., requires the driver of an automobile to yield the right of way to a pedestrian under those circumstances.

The difficulties arising from administering a rule which sought to give the automobile and a pedestrian equal rights at crossings resulted in disadvantages and some misfortune to pedestrians. The rapid movement and the bulk of the automobile, the thoughtlessness of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raabe v. BrzoskowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Klokow v. HarbaughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Grimes v. SnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moran v. GatzIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pryor's Administrator v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Hoeft v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stahl v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Horwitz v. EuroveOhio Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API