Horwitz v. Eurove
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
As we view it, the real question in this case is: Where a city ordinance gives a pedestrian the right of way at a street crossing, is he thereby absolved from the duty of exercising ordinary care for his own safety?
This court has never passed directly on the question, but courts of last resort in other jurisdictions have had the precise matter before them and have generally reached the conclusion that a pedestrian given the right of way by city ordinance or statute at a street crossing is not thereby relieved from the common law duty to exercise ordinary care for his own protection.
Thus, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morris v. BloomgreenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Lieberman v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Switzer v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Brown v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pryor's Administrator v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Whittaker v. ThornberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Gearhart v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Will v. McCoyOhio Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.