Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Madson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

No bill of exceptions was settled in this case. The only question open for review is whether or not the judgment is supported by the findings of fact. Ellis v. Frawley, 165 Wis. 381, 161 N. W. 364; Hoff v. Hackett, 148 Wis. 32, 134 N. W. 132; Kassuba Commission Co. v. Blodgett, 155 Wis. 529, 143 N. W. 1060, 145 N. W. 177.

We cannot state the facts necessary to a consideration of the questions raised any more briefly than in the language of the findings. After making the necessary statement of the nature of the contract and the execution of the indemnity agreement the court found:

“3. That the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baumann v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ellis v. FrawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Wisconsin Central Railway Co. v. SchugWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Town of Beloit v. HeinemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Milwaukee-Western Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. United States v. TylerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
  3. Ramminger v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Christian v. City of New LondonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bobczyk v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API