Bobczyk v. Integrity Mutual Insurance

There is no bill of exceptions in this case and under these circumstances the findings of the trial court cannot be challenged by the appellant. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Madson, 202 Wis. 271, 232 N. W. 525. It is the appellant’s position that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Maxon v. Gates, 136 Wis. 270, 116 N. W. 758. The court having denied defendant’s motion to change the answers of the special verdict, appellant concludes that this is only consistent with an opinion on the part of the trial judge…