Legal Opinion

Munoz v. England

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided March 18, 2008No. Civil 06-00649 JMS/KSCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 28, 2002, Plaintiff Ysauro Munoz (“Plaintiff’) and the Commander of the Navel Ship Repair Facility (“NSRF”) in Yokosuka, Japan, Plaintiffs employer, signed a settlement agreement in which Plaintiff agreed to withdraw two complaints he had filed with the Navy’s Equal Employment Office (“EEO”). These complaints charged that the NSRF discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of race and age, by, among other things,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berry v. GutierrezDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  2. Munoz v. MabusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API