Legal Opinion

United States v. Fensterer & Ruhe

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 6, 1911No. 620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal horn Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 24819 (T. D. 31300).

1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Judge

The merchandise involved in this case consists of magnesia rings used for holding in place the incandescent mantles of gas burners. The importation was made under the tariff act of 1909, and the articles. were classified by the collector as "manufactures of bisque, undecorated,” and were assessed at 55 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 94 of that act.

The importers duly filed their protest to this classification and contended that the merchandise should be assessed at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 95 as articles composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rolland Frères (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Faunce v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Stegemann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Arthur H. Thomas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API