Russell v. Clinton Motor Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Creen
The bill herein was filed to enjoin a suit at law by the Clinton Motor Company on certain notes executed by complainant B. W. Bussell. The Clinton Motor Company answered, and filed a cross-bill against said Bussell. The chancellor dismissed the original bill, and rendered a decree on the cross-bill, and the complainant has appealed.
On August 9,1920, the parties entered into a written contract whereby the complainant Bussell agreed to buy a Briscoe automobile at the price of $1,395 and in which' it was agreed that the legal title of said car should not pass from the Clinton Motor Co. to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fry v. ShipleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Lieberman v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Kenner & Co. v. PetersTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by19 opinions
- Murray v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Mitchell v. Automobile Sales Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of California v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Breeden v. Elliott Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Douglas v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.