Lieberman v. Puckett
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DICKSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Dickson County. A. J. AbeRNathy, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.
Complainants sold defendant an engine, boiler, and sawmill for $1,100, of which $275 was paid in cash, and for the remainder notes were executed, falling due in installments. These *274notes were not paid as they fell due, and complainants, having reserved the title to the machinery in their sale, filed this bill to replevy the same, and under it obtained possession of the property. The bill was filed in September, 1891, and process was returnable to March, 1892. At that term defendant, Puckett, filed an answer contesting the right of complainants to retake the machinery, and also made his answer…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Murray v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Russell v. Clinton Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Mitchell v. Automobile Sales Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Ward v. SharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.