Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of California v. McCaskill

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 31, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Two cases are involved here. By stipulation hoth cases were tried simultaneously, the pleadings and evidence being the same except for some' slight differences in the dates of the policies and amounts claimed thereunder. A separate verdict and judgment was rendered in each case. This court, upon motion of counsel for plaintiff in error, ordered that the transcript of record filed under the first writ of error should serve as the transcript of record in the second writ of error, and that the second cause should be heard by the court at the same time and that one brief by each party should be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jefferson County v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  2. Rosenfeld v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. New York Life Insurance v. LecksSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Russell v. Clinton Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Insurance Company v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Salter v. National Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Employers'liability Assur. Corp. v. Royals Farm Sup., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. The Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  5. Hassen v. Mediaone of Greater Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API