Legal Opinion
State v. Hunter
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 19, 1996No. 95-622PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
Appellant, Frederick W. Hunter, was convicted of sexual exploitation of a minor after he photographed his partially-clothed, adopted daughter in provocative poses. See Iowa Code §§ 728.12(1), 728.1(6)(g) (1993). On appeal, he claims section 728.1(6)(g) is void for vagueness. We disagree and affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Clad only in his underwear and sexually aroused, Hunter photographed his twelve-year-old daughter in various stages of undress in a motel room. Several photographs show the girl’s exposed breasts, pubic area and buttocks. In a number of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- State v. Hernandez-LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In Re the Detention of GarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. MusserSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.